Gold Slips as Hawkish Fed, Firmer Dollar Weigh on Bullion
Video section is only available for
PREMIUM MEMBERS
Gold futures settled lower on Monday, snapping a three-session winning streak as expectations of further tightening by the Federal Reserve this year, combined with hawkish signals from other major central banks, put a firm bid under the US dollar. Three forces are doing the heavy lifting today, and all three run through the same channel.
The dollar and the December hike: The dollar index edged higher against its six major peers, extending a move that saw the greenback gain more than 1% last week on the heels of the Fed's rate hike. For gold, the arithmetic is unforgiving: a stronger dollar makes bullion more expensive for buyers holding other currencies, and demand thins at the margin.
What is keeping the dollar bid is the forward curve. The CME FedWatch Tool now shows traders pricing an 88% probability of another quarter-point hike in December. That is not a market hedging its bets; that is a market that has largely made up its mind. Jim Wyckoff of American Gold Exchange put it plainly, noting that lingering concern among bulls about tighter US policy pushed the dollar index to a better-than-two-month high on Friday, and those bearish elements are working directly against the precious metals. I would add one point to that. Gold is traditionally regarded as an inflation hedge, but it carries no yield. In a rising-rate environment, every basis point that Treasuries add is a basis point of opportunity cost that gold has to overcome. That is the headwind, and it is a real one.
17% off the February high: The second force is simply where we are on the map. Bullion is now roughly 17% below the session high set on February 27. That is a meaningful correction by any standard, and it is why I keep returning to what I call the inversion dynamic.
In a prior era, the US-Israeli conflict with Iran would have sent capital straight into gold as a safe haven. That is not what has happened. Instead, the conflict has pushed energy prices higher, higher energy has fed inflation expectations, and elevated inflation expectations have hardened the resolve of central banks to keep policy restrictive. Geopolitical risk is still flowing into the gold market, but it is arriving through the back door, as a reason for the Fed to stay hawkish, rather than through the front door as safe-haven demand. Until that circuit is broken, geopolitical headlines are as likely to weigh on gold as to lift it.
Inflation "too high across all sectors": The third force arrived over the weekend. On Sunday, Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari said inflation is too high across all sectors of the US economy, not just oil. That statement matters because it closes off the argument that today's inflation is a narrow energy story that will resolve itself when crude cools. If the Fed views the problem as broad-based, the Fed views the remedy as broad-based too, and that keeps December firmly on the table.
Where I differ from the bears: None of this, in my view, marks the beginning of a prolonged bearish trend. Two observations support that.
TD Securities anticipates that near-term weakness will be limited to modest CTA selling and will increasingly be treated as a buying opportunity. Rania Gule of XS.com makes a similar case, arguing that the market is being pulled between conflicting fundamentals and that higher rates alone do not define a lasting downtrend. Her line in the sand is $4,400 on the upside: a decisive close above that level would demonstrate that buyers can absorb both a stronger dollar and higher yields. Failure there keeps the door open to a retest of prior support.
That framing is consistent with how I read the technicals. A single day's decline against a backdrop of rate expectations that are already fully priced tells me the market is digesting, not capitulating. Until the Convergence Principle gives me alignment across candlestick structure, wave count, and Fibonacci levels pointing lower, I am treating this as a correction within a larger structure, not a change in that structure.
Wishing you, as always, good trading,

Gary S. Wagner - Executive Producer